Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] serial: 8250_dw: allow lower reference frequencies

2015-07-23 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 06:12:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > We have couple of standard but rare used baudrates which are not supported by > 1,8432MHz reference frequency. Besides that user can potentially ask for any > baudrate (via BOTHER flag) and we currently don't fully support that.

Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] serial: 8250_dw: allow lower reference frequencies

2015-07-23 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 06:12:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: We have couple of standard but rare used baudrates which are not supported by 1,8432MHz reference frequency. Besides that user can potentially ask for any baudrate (via BOTHER flag) and we currently don't fully support that. Since

[PATCH v4 6/6] serial: 8250_dw: allow lower reference frequencies

2015-07-14 Thread Andy Shevchenko
We have couple of standard but rare used baudrates which are not supported by 1,8432MHz reference frequency. Besides that user can potentially ask for any baudrate (via BOTHER flag) and we currently don't fully support that. Since clk-fractional-divider is moved to use rational best approximation

[PATCH v4 6/6] serial: 8250_dw: allow lower reference frequencies

2015-07-14 Thread Andy Shevchenko
We have couple of standard but rare used baudrates which are not supported by 1,8432MHz reference frequency. Besides that user can potentially ask for any baudrate (via BOTHER flag) and we currently don't fully support that. Since clk-fractional-divider is moved to use rational best approximation