Re: [PATCH v5][RESEND] X86 platform: New BayTrail IOSF-SB MBI driver

2013-12-19 Thread David E. Box
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 02:59:29AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, December 19, 2013 02:37:46 PM David E. Box wrote: > > From: "David E. Box" > > > > Current Intel SOC cores use a MailBox Interface (MBI) to provide access to > > unit > > devices connected to the system fabric. Thi

Re: [PATCH v5][RESEND] X86 platform: New BayTrail IOSF-SB MBI driver

2013-12-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 02:37:46 PM David E. Box wrote: > From: "David E. Box" > > Current Intel SOC cores use a MailBox Interface (MBI) to provide access to > unit > devices connected to the system fabric. This driver implements access to this > interface on BayTrail platforms. This is a

[PATCH v5][RESEND] X86 platform: New BayTrail IOSF-SB MBI driver

2013-12-19 Thread David E. Box
From: "David E. Box" Current Intel SOC cores use a MailBox Interface (MBI) to provide access to unit devices connected to the system fabric. This driver implements access to this interface on BayTrail platforms. This is a requirement for drivers that need access to unit registers on the platform