On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:55:26AM +, Kaiwan N Billimoria wrote:
> Hi Tobin,
>
> Thanks very much for your detailed review.
> Just wanted to say that am up to my neck in work (an exceptionally busy
> time), hence will take a while to work on this - around another 3 weeks
> perhaps.
> I'd like
Hi Kaiwan,
Thanks for the patch
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 05:51:25PM +0530, kaiwan.billimo...@gmail.com wrote:
> The script now attempts to detect the architecture it's running upon; as of
> now,
> we explicitly support x86_64, PPC64, ARM64, MIPS64 and x86_32.
This is incorrect. We do not current
As a follow-up, pl see below some quick test cases on an emulated ARM32
platform (the Yocto-based qemuarm32 ARM Versatile):
root@qemuarm:~# ./leaking_addresses.pl
FATAL: Script does not recognize your architecture
$ uname -m
armv5tejl
root@qemuarm:~
The script now attempts to detect the architecture it's running upon; as of now,
we explicitly support x86_64, PPC64, ARM64, MIPS64 and x86_32.
If it's one of them, we proceed "normally". If we fail to detect the arch,
we fallback to 64-bit scanning, _unless_ the user has passed either of these
op
4 matches
Mail list logo
