On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:28 PM Joe Perches wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 21:22 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > It would be nice to get this into mainline sooner rather than later so
> > that it can start filtering into the stable trees. ToT LLVM builds have
> > been broken for a month now.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:22 PM Nathan Chancellor
wrote:
>
> It would be nice to get this into mainline sooner rather than later so
> that it can start filtering into the stable trees. ToT LLVM builds have
> been broken for a month now.
Hi Andrew, I appreciate your help getting this submitted to
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 21:22 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> It would be nice to get this into mainline sooner rather than later so
> that it can start filtering into the stable trees. ToT LLVM builds have
> been broken for a month now.
People that build stable trees with new compilers
unsupporte
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:16:43AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> LLVM implemented a recent "libcall optimization" that lowers calls to
> `sprintf(dest, "%s", str)` where the return value is used to
> `stpcpy(dest, str) - dest`. This generally avoids the machinery involved
> in parsing format str
LLVM implemented a recent "libcall optimization" that lowers calls to
`sprintf(dest, "%s", str)` where the return value is used to
`stpcpy(dest, str) - dest`. This generally avoids the machinery involved
in parsing format strings. `stpcpy` is just like `strcpy` except it
returns the pointer to the
5 matches
Mail list logo
