Re: [PATCH v5] reset: add support for non-DT systems

2018-02-28 Thread Philipp Zabel
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 19:07 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-02-27 17:10 GMT+01:00 Philipp Zabel : > > Hi Bartosz, > > > > thank you for the update. > > > > On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 12:39 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > > > > > The reset framework only

Re: [PATCH v5] reset: add support for non-DT systems

2018-02-27 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-02-27 17:10 GMT+01:00 Philipp Zabel : > Hi Bartosz, > > thank you for the update. > > On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 12:39 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >> >> The reset framework only supports device-tree. There are some platforms >> however, which need to use it even

Re: [PATCH v5] reset: add support for non-DT systems

2018-02-27 Thread Philipp Zabel
Hi Bartosz, thank you for the update. On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 12:39 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > The reset framework only supports device-tree. There are some platforms > however, which need to use it even in legacy, board-file based mode. > > An example of s

Re: [PATCH v5] reset: add support for non-DT systems

2018-02-23 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-02-23 12:39 GMT+01:00 Bartosz Golaszewski : > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > The reset framework only supports device-tree. There are some platforms > however, which need to use it even in legacy, board-file based mode. > > An example of such architecture is the DaVinci family of SoCs which >

[PATCH v5] reset: add support for non-DT systems

2018-02-23 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski The reset framework only supports device-tree. There are some platforms however, which need to use it even in legacy, board-file based mode. An example of such architecture is the DaVinci family of SoCs which supports both device tree and legacy boot modes and we don't