On 07/31/2015 04:43 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hey Boris,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:18:20PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Only V5, no extra changes.
Including running the ldt_gdt test?
Yes, except that 32-on-64 doesn't work, but that's not Xen-specific.
so which tests are you running exactl
Hey Boris,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:18:20PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>Only V5, no extra changes.
> >Including running the ldt_gdt test?
>
> Yes, except that 32-on-64 doesn't work, but that's not Xen-specific.
so which tests are you running exactly and where can I get them? Andy's
repo?
On 07/30/2015 01:06 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 30/07/15 17:31, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 07/30/2015 12:12 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 30/07/15 17:05, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:53:34AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
As far as Xen guests are concerned,
Tested-by: Boris
On 30/07/15 17:31, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 12:12 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 30/07/15 17:05, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:53:34AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
As far as Xen guests are concerned,
Tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky
>>> Does that mea
On 07/30/2015 12:12 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 30/07/15 17:05, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:53:34AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
As far as Xen guests are concerned,
Tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky
Does that mean, this patch 1/4 fixes the 32bit issue you guys are still
debug
On 30/07/15 17:05, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:53:34AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> As far as Xen guests are concerned,
>>
>> Tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky
> Does that mean, this patch 1/4 fixes the 32bit issue you guys are still
> debugging on the v4 thread? Or does that
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:53:34AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> As far as Xen guests are concerned,
>
> Tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky
Does that mean, this patch 1/4 fixes the 32bit issue you guys are still
debugging on the v4 thread? Or does that need more fixing?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
On 07/28/2015 01:29 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
This is intended for x86/urgent. Sorry for taking so long, but it
seemed nice to avoid breaking Xen.
This fixes the "dazed and confused" issue which was exposed by the
CVE-2015-5157 fix. It's also probably a good general attack surface
reduction,
This is intended for x86/urgent. Sorry for taking so long, but it
seemed nice to avoid breaking Xen.
This fixes the "dazed and confused" issue which was exposed by the
CVE-2015-5157 fix. It's also probably a good general attack surface
reduction, and it replaces some scary code with IMO less sca
9 matches
Mail list logo
