On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:39 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 03-09-20, 14:32, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> > Hi Rafael, Viresh,
> >
> > Would it be okay for you to apply this series, as the majority of
> > changes are in cpufreq? For arch_topology and arm64 changes, they have
> > been reviewed and acked-
On 03-09-20, 14:32, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> Hi Rafael, Viresh,
>
> Would it be okay for you to apply this series, as the majority of
> changes are in cpufreq? For arch_topology and arm64 changes, they have
> been reviewed and acked-by Catalin and Sudeep.
>
> Also, please let me know if I should
Hi Rafael, Viresh,
Would it be okay for you to apply this series, as the majority of
changes are in cpufreq? For arch_topology and arm64 changes, they have
been reviewed and acked-by Catalin and Sudeep.
Also, please let me know if I should send v6 with Sudeep's Reviewed-by/s
applied.
Thank you,
Hi,
v4->v5
- I've applied Viresh's remaining suggestion and Acked-by/s
- v4 can be found at [4]
- v5 is based on linux-next 20200828
Thank you,
Ionela.
---
v3->v4:
- addressing Viresh's comments on patches 1/5 and 3/5, and
- with his Acked-by applied for the rest of the patches;
- v3 can b
4 matches
Mail list logo
