Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-07-13 Thread Daejun Park
Hi Bean > > Hi Bart, > > > > > > Bart - how do you want to proceed? > > > > > > Hi Avri and Daejun, > > > > > > As far as I can see none of the five patches have Reviewed-by tags > > > yet. I > > > think that Martin expects formal reviews for this patch series from > > > one or > > > more

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-07-13 Thread Bean Huo
On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 10:27 +0900, Daejun Park wrote: > Hi Bart, > > > > Bart - how do you want to proceed? > > > > Hi Avri and Daejun, > > > > As far as I can see none of the five patches have Reviewed-by tags > > yet. I > > think that Martin expects formal reviews for this patch series from >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-07-12 Thread Daejun Park
Hi Bart, > > Bart - how do you want to proceed? > > Hi Avri and Daejun, > > As far as I can see none of the five patches have Reviewed-by tags yet. I > think that Martin expects formal reviews for this patch series from one or > more reviewers who are not colleagues of the author of this patch

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-07-12 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 2020-07-09 01:40, Avri Altman wrote: > Bart - how do you want to proceed? Hi Avri and Daejun, As far as I can see none of the five patches have Reviewed-by tags yet. I think that Martin expects formal reviews for this patch series from one or more reviewers who are not colleagues of the

RE: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-07-12 Thread Daejun Park
Hi Bart, > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Just a gentle reminder that I'd like some feedback. > > > > Any suggestions here? > > > If no-one objects, I think you can submit your patches for review as non- > > RFC. > > >

RE: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-07-09 Thread Avri Altman
> > Hello, > > > > > > Just a gentle reminder that I'd like some feedback. > > > Any suggestions here? > > If no-one objects, I think you can submit your patches for review as non- > RFC. > > > [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Boo

RE: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-07-09 Thread Daejun Park
> Hello, > > > > Just a gentle reminder that I'd like some feedback. > > Any suggestions here? > If no-one objects, I think you can submit your patches for review as non-RFC. > [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support ~~ It is non-RFC version. Thanks, Daejun.

RE: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-07-08 Thread Avri Altman
> Hello, > > Just a gentle reminder that I'd like some feedback. > Any suggestions here? If no-one objects, I think you can submit your patches for review as non-RFC. Thanks, Avri > > Thanks, > Daejun

RE: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-07-08 Thread Daejun Park
Hello, Just a gentle reminder that I'd like some feedback. Any suggestions here? Thanks, Daejun

[PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-07-02 Thread Daejun Park
Changelog: v4 -> v5 Delete unused macro define. v3 -> v4 1. Cleanup. v2 -> v3 1. Add checking input module parameter value. 2. Change base commit from 5.8/scsi-queue to 5.9/scsi-queue. 3. Cleanup for unused variables and label. v1 -> v2 1. Change the full boilerplate text to SPDX style. 2.