On Monday 03 March 2014 10:10 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 05:08:09PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Added support for optional PHY in dwc3 as not all SoCs having PHYs for DWC3
should be programmed. While this can be considered as a temporary fix,
a long term solut
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 05:08:09PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Added support for optional PHY in dwc3 as not all SoCs having PHYs for DWC3
> should be programmed. While this can be considered as a temporary fix,
> a long term solution would be to add 'nop' PHY for platforms that doe
Roger,
On Monday 03 March 2014 05:51 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Hi Kishon,
Which tree are these patches based on?
mainline + Felipe's testing/next + Revert "usb: dwc3: core: enable
Suspend bit for USB2/3 PHYs" + Revert "usb: dwc3: preparation for
adapting dwc3 to generic phy framework"
Than
Hi Kishon,
Which tree are these patches based on?
cheers,
-roger
On 03/03/2014 01:38 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Added support for optional PHY in dwc3 as not all SoCs having PHYs for DWC3
> should be programmed. While this can be considered as a temporary fix,
> a long term solution wou
Added support for optional PHY in dwc3 as not all SoCs having PHYs for DWC3
should be programmed. While this can be considered as a temporary fix,
a long term solution would be to add 'nop' PHY for platforms that does
not have programmable PHY.
Adapted DWC3 and USB3 PHY to use Generic PHY framework
5 matches
Mail list logo