On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:03:58AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Any possibility to make v5 into v4.7 so that we can move on about
> multipage bvecs?
>
> BTW, even though not considering mp bvecs, this patchset is still a
> good cleanup.
Agreed. I'm fine with the series and it looks harmless enough
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:03:58AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Any possibility to make v5 into v4.7 so that we can move on about
> multipage bvecs?
>
> BTW, even though not considering mp bvecs, this patchset is still a
> good cleanup.
Agreed. I'm fine with the series and it looks harmless enough
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Interests[1] have been shown in multipage bvecs, so this patchset
> try to prepare for the support and do two things:
>
> 1) the 1st 4 patches use bvec iterator to implement iterate_bvec(),
> then we can drop the
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Interests[1] have been shown in multipage bvecs, so this patchset
> try to prepare for the support and do two things:
>
> 1) the 1st 4 patches use bvec iterator to implement iterate_bvec(),
> then we can drop the non-standard way for
Hi,
Interests[1] have been shown in multipage bvecs, so this patchset
try to prepare for the support and do two things:
1) the 1st 4 patches use bvec iterator to implement iterate_bvec(),
then we can drop the non-standard way for iterating bvec, which
can be thought as a good cleanup for
Hi,
Interests[1] have been shown in multipage bvecs, so this patchset
try to prepare for the support and do two things:
1) the 1st 4 patches use bvec iterator to implement iterate_bvec(),
then we can drop the non-standard way for iterating bvec, which
can be thought as a good cleanup for
6 matches
Mail list logo