On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Collin.
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:41:46PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
>> I think some of it is just historic, we previously did not group
>> application threads in the scheduler, so it would cause a change in
>> behavior if we started g
Hello, Collin.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:41:46PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
> I think some of it is just historic, we previously did not group
> application threads in the scheduler, so it would cause a change in
> behavior if we started grouping them. I will investigate switching to
> a co-mount
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Collin.
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 05:53:59PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
>> I understand why it makes sense from a code perspective to combine cpu
>> and cpuacct, but by combining them you are enforcing a strange
>> requirement that to mea
Hello, Collin.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 05:53:59PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
> I understand why it makes sense from a code perspective to combine cpu
> and cpuacct, but by combining them you are enforcing a strange
> requirement that to measure the cpu usage of a group of processes you
Well, "stra
On 01/23/2013 05:53 AM, Colin Cross wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:14:27PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
Android userspace is currently using both cpu and cpuacct, and not
co-mounting them. They are used for fundamenta
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:14:27PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> > Android userspace is currently using both cpu and cpuacct, and not
>> > co-mounting them. They are used for fundamentally different uses such
>> > that creating a sin
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:14:27PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > Android userspace is currently using both cpu and cpuacct, and not
> > co-mounting them. They are used for fundamentally different uses such
> > that creating a single hierarchy for both of them while maintaining
> > the ex
On 01/16/2013 04:33 AM, Colin Cross wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> [ update: I thought I posted this already before leaving for holidays.
>> However,
>> now that I am checking for replies, I can't find nor replies nor the
>> original
>> mail in my boxes or a
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> [ update: I thought I posted this already before leaving for holidays.
> However,
> now that I am checking for replies, I can't find nor replies nor the
> original
> mail in my boxes or archives. I am posting again for safety sake, but s
Hello, Glauber.
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:45:27PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> [ update: I thought I posted this already before leaving for holidays.
> However,
> now that I am checking for replies, I can't find nor replies nor the
> original
> mail in my boxes or archives. I am posting ag
[ update: I thought I posted this already before leaving for holidays. However,
now that I am checking for replies, I can't find nor replies nor the original
mail in my boxes or archives. I am posting again for safety sake, but sorry
you are getting this twice by any chance ]
Hi all,
This i
11 matches
Mail list logo
