Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] kmem controller for memcg.

2012-10-19 Thread Glauber Costa
On 10/18/2012 11:21 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:51:05 +0400 > Glauber Costa wrote: > >> On 10/18/2012 02:11 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:16:37 +0400 >>> Glauber Costa wrote: >>> ... A general explanation of what this is all about follow

Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] kmem controller for memcg.

2012-10-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:51:05 +0400 Glauber Costa wrote: > On 10/18/2012 02:11 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:16:37 +0400 > > Glauber Costa wrote: > > > >> ... > >> > >> A general explanation of what this is all about follows: > >> > >> The kernel memory limitation mechanism

Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] kmem controller for memcg.

2012-10-18 Thread Glauber Costa
On 10/18/2012 02:11 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:16:37 +0400 > Glauber Costa wrote: > >> ... >> >> A general explanation of what this is all about follows: >> >> The kernel memory limitation mechanism for memcg concerns itself with >> disallowing potentially non-reclaimable a

Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] kmem controller for memcg.

2012-10-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:16:37 +0400 Glauber Costa wrote: > ... > > A general explanation of what this is all about follows: > > The kernel memory limitation mechanism for memcg concerns itself with > disallowing potentially non-reclaimable allocations to happen in exaggerate > quantities by a par

[PATCH v5 00/14] kmem controller for memcg.

2012-10-16 Thread Glauber Costa
Hi, This is the first part of the kernel memory controller for memcg. It has been discussed many times, and I consider this stable enough to be on tree. A follow up to this series are the patches to also track slab memory. They are not included here because I believe we could benefit from merging