Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

On 24/07/2020 08:52, Frank Lee wrote: > This patch set adds initial support for allwinner a100 soc, > which is a 64-bit tablet chip. Applied patches 7,8,9 Thanks -- Daniel -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro:

Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:53 AM Frank Lee wrote: > dt-bindings: pinctrl: sunxi: Get rid of continual nesting > dt-bindings: pinctrl: sunxi: Add A100 pinctrl bindings > pinctrl: sunxi: add support for the Allwinner A100 pin controller These three patches (3,4,5) are now applied to the

Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

Hi Linus On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:02:29PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:53 AM Frank Lee wrote: > > > This patch set adds initial support for allwinner a100 soc, > > which is a 64-bit tablet chip. > > Shall I commit the pinctrl patches (if Maxime ACKed) separately >

Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

HI Linus, On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 6:02 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:53 AM Frank Lee wrote: > > > This patch set adds initial support for allwinner a100 soc, > > which is a 64-bit tablet chip. > > Shall I commit the pinctrl patches (if Maxime ACKed) separately > or not?

Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:53 AM Frank Lee wrote: > This patch set adds initial support for allwinner a100 soc, > which is a 64-bit tablet chip. Shall I commit the pinctrl patches (if Maxime ACKed) separately or not? Once Maxime is happy, I am usually happy too. Yours, Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

On Tue, 25 Aug 2020, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:03:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2020, Frank Lee wrote: > > > > > ping.. > > > > "Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable > > time for review. People get busy, go on

Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:55:32AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:03:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2020, Frank Lee wrote: > > > > > ping.. > > > > "Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable > > time for review. People get

Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:03:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 24 Aug 2020, Frank Lee wrote: > > > ping.. > > "Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable > time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences > and so on so unless there is some

Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

On Mon, 24 Aug 2020, Frank Lee wrote: > ping.. "Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a

Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

ping..

Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

HI Maxime, Any comments on thermal and other patches? I hope these patches can be integrated into the mainline as soon as possible. Thx, Yangtao

[PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support

This patch set adds initial support for allwinner a100 soc, which is a 64-bit tablet chip. v5: -Drop redundant SOB for thermal series patch -Trival a100 dtsi fix v4: -Drop "dt-bindings: pinctrl: sunxi: make gpio banks supplies required" -Fix dcdc1 regulator name -Get rid of underscore in dts