Hi Anand,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo Choi,
>
> On 24 March 2016 at 10:00, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>>
>> To Anand,
>> First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
>> I removed the
Hi Anand,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo Choi,
>
> On 24 March 2016 at 10:00, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>>
>> To Anand,
>> First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
>> I removed the your tested-by tag from this version
>>
Hi Chanwoo Choi,
On 24 March 2016 at 10:00, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>
> To Anand,
> First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
> I removed the your tested-by tag from this version
> because I modified the devfreq core using
Hi Chanwoo Choi,
On 24 March 2016 at 10:00, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>
> To Anand,
> First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
> I removed the your tested-by tag from this version
> because I modified the devfreq core using DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER
>
Hi Markus,
On 2016년 03월 24일 23:37, Markus Reichl wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> Am 24.03.2016 um 05:25 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> This patchset uses the DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER notifier to connecth
>> devfreq device using ondemand governor and devfreq device using passive
>>
Hi Markus,
On 2016년 03월 24일 23:37, Markus Reichl wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> Am 24.03.2016 um 05:25 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> This patchset uses the DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER notifier to connecth
>> devfreq device using ondemand governor and devfreq device using passive
>>
Hi Chanwoo,
Am 24.03.2016 um 05:25 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
> Dear all,
>
> This patchset uses the DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER notifier to connecth
> devfreq device using ondemand governor and devfreq device using passive
> governor. Also I fix the some issue reported by 'Tobias Jakobi' and add the
Hi Chanwoo,
Am 24.03.2016 um 05:25 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
> Dear all,
>
> This patchset uses the DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER notifier to connecth
> devfreq device using ondemand governor and devfreq device using passive
> governor. Also I fix the some issue reported by 'Tobias Jakobi' and add the
Hi Makus,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Markus Reichl wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> Am 24.03.2016 um 05:30 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
>> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>>
>> To Anand,
>> First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
>> I removed the your tested-by tag from
Hi Makus,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Markus Reichl wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> Am 24.03.2016 um 05:30 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
>> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>>
>> To Anand,
>> First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
>> I removed the your tested-by tag from this version
>> because I
Hi Tobias,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Tobias Jakobi
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
>
> Markus Reichl wrote:
>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>
>> Am 24.03.2016 um 05:30 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
>>> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>>>
>>> To Anand,
>>> First of all, thanks to your test on
Hi Tobias,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Tobias Jakobi
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
>
> Markus Reichl wrote:
>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>
>> Am 24.03.2016 um 05:30 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
>>> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>>>
>>> To Anand,
>>> First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
>>> I removed
Hello everybody,
Markus Reichl wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> Am 24.03.2016 um 05:30 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
>> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>>
>> To Anand,
>> First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
>> I removed the your tested-by tag from this version
>> because I modified the devfreq core
Hello everybody,
Markus Reichl wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> Am 24.03.2016 um 05:30 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
>> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>>
>> To Anand,
>> First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
>> I removed the your tested-by tag from this version
>> because I modified the devfreq core
Hi Chanwoo,
Am 24.03.2016 um 05:30 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>
> To Anand,
> First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
> I removed the your tested-by tag from this version
> because I modified the devfreq core using DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER
> notifier.
> I
Hi Chanwoo,
Am 24.03.2016 um 05:30 schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
> Dear Anand and Tobias,
>
> To Anand,
> First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
> I removed the your tested-by tag from this version
> because I modified the devfreq core using DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER
> notifier.
> I
Dear Anand and Tobias,
To Anand,
First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
I removed the your tested-by tag from this version
because I modified the devfreq core using DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER notifier.
I think that this patch-set need to test with this patchset.
If you possible,
Dear Anand and Tobias,
To Anand,
First of all, thanks to your test on previous patchset.
I removed the your tested-by tag from this version
because I modified the devfreq core using DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER notifier.
I think that this patch-set need to test with this patchset.
If you possible,
Dear all,
This patchset uses the DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER notifier to connecth
devfreq device using ondemand governor and devfreq device using passive
governor. Also I fix the some issue reported by 'Tobias Jakobi' and add the
detailed issue information. But, this patchset don't modify the
Dear all,
This patchset uses the DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER notifier to connecth
devfreq device using ondemand governor and devfreq device using passive
governor. Also I fix the some issue reported by 'Tobias Jakobi' and add the
detailed issue information. But, this patchset don't modify the
20 matches
Mail list logo