Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor

2017-05-31 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
Stephen Hemminger writes: > On Tue, 30 May 2017 13:34:16 +0200 > Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c >> index 04cb8d3..bdcc433 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c >> @@ -175,9

Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor

2017-05-30 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 30 May 2017 13:34:16 +0200 Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c > index 04cb8d3..bdcc433 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c > @@ -175,9 +175,15 @@ static void __init ms_hype

[PATCH v5 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor

2017-05-30 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we currently have a mix, report acquired misc features as well. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan Tested-by: Simon Xiao Tested-