On 08/26/2014 04:36 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The computation of avg_load and avg_load_per_task should only takes into
> account the number of cfs tasks. The non cfs task are already taken into
> account by decreasing the cpu's capacity and they will be tracked in the
> CPU's utilization
On 08/26/2014 04:36 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The computation of avg_load and avg_load_per_task should only takes into
account the number of cfs tasks. The non cfs task are already taken into
account by decreasing the cpu's capacity and they will be tracked in the
CPU's utilization
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 09:17 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 4 September 2014 01:43, Tim Chen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 13:09 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> On 30 August 2014 14:00, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> >> > Hi Vincent,
> >> >
> >> > On 08/26/2014 04:36 PM, Vincent Guittot
On 4 September 2014 01:43, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 13:09 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 30 August 2014 14:00, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>> > Hi Vincent,
>> >
>> > On 08/26/2014 04:36 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> >> The computation of avg_load and avg_load_per_task should only
On 4 September 2014 01:43, Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 13:09 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 30 August 2014 14:00, Preeti U Murthy pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On 08/26/2014 04:36 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The computation of avg_load
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 09:17 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 4 September 2014 01:43, Tim Chen tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 13:09 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 30 August 2014 14:00, Preeti U Murthy pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 13:09 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 30 August 2014 14:00, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> > On 08/26/2014 04:36 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> The computation of avg_load and avg_load_per_task should only takes into
> >> account the number of cfs tasks.
On 30 August 2014 14:00, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 08/26/2014 04:36 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> The computation of avg_load and avg_load_per_task should only takes into
>> account the number of cfs tasks. The non cfs task are already taken into
>> account by decreasing the
On 30 August 2014 14:00, Preeti U Murthy pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On 08/26/2014 04:36 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The computation of avg_load and avg_load_per_task should only takes into
account the number of cfs tasks. The non cfs task are already taken into
account by
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 13:09 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 30 August 2014 14:00, Preeti U Murthy pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On 08/26/2014 04:36 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The computation of avg_load and avg_load_per_task should only takes into
account the number of
Hi Vincent,
On 08/26/2014 04:36 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The computation of avg_load and avg_load_per_task should only takes into
> account the number of cfs tasks. The non cfs task are already taken into
> account by decreasing the cpu's capacity and they will be tracked in the
> CPU's
Hi Vincent,
On 08/26/2014 04:36 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The computation of avg_load and avg_load_per_task should only takes into
account the number of cfs tasks. The non cfs task are already taken into
account by decreasing the cpu's capacity and they will be tracked in the
CPU's
The computation of avg_load and avg_load_per_task should only takes into
account the number of cfs tasks. The non cfs task are already taken into
account by decreasing the cpu's capacity and they will be tracked in the
CPU's utilization (group_utilization) of the next patches
Signed-off-by:
The computation of avg_load and avg_load_per_task should only takes into
account the number of cfs tasks. The non cfs task are already taken into
account by decreasing the cpu's capacity and they will be tracked in the
CPU's utilization (group_utilization) of the next patches
Signed-off-by:
14 matches
Mail list logo