* Kees Cook wrote:
> > Also note the assertive tone: if this Kconfig feature is eanbled, we say
> > that
> > the kernel address _will_ be randomized, and we should make sure it is. (If
> > for some weird reason randomization fails we should warn prominently during
> > bootup.)
>
> This will
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> From: Baoquan He
>>
>> Currently CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE_MAX_OFFSET is used to limit the maximum
>> offset for kernel randomization. This limit doesn't need to be a CONFIG
>> since it is tied completely to KERNEL_IMAGE
* Kees Cook wrote:
> From: Baoquan He
>
> Currently CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE_MAX_OFFSET is used to limit the maximum
> offset for kernel randomization. This limit doesn't need to be a CONFIG
> since it is tied completely to KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE, and will make no sense
> once physical and virtual off
From: Baoquan He
Currently CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE_MAX_OFFSET is used to limit the maximum
offset for kernel randomization. This limit doesn't need to be a CONFIG
since it is tied completely to KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE, and will make no sense
once physical and virtual offsets are randomized separately. Th
4 matches
Mail list logo