On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:13:59PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:08:33PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
> > its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
> >
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:08:33PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
> its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
> necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
>
> v5: Un-reorder some
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:08:33PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
v5: Un-reorder some
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:13:59PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:08:33PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
necessitating its
This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
v5: Un-reorder some functions, to make the patch easier to review
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet
---
This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
v5: Un-reorder some functions, to make the patch easier to review
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet
6 matches
Mail list logo