On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 05:40:39PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:19:36 +,
> Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 05:06:58PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > > On 24/03/2021 16:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > >
> > > > OK, so we definitely do need these
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:19:36 +,
Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 05:06:58PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > On 24/03/2021 16:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, so we definitely do need these patches, don't we? Both? Just one?
> > > Please have a look at kvmarm/fixes
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 05:06:58PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 24/03/2021 16:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:25:12 +,
> > Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > >
> > > On 24/03/2021 16:16, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:51:14 +,
> > > > Suzuki K Poulos
On 24/03/2021 16:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:25:12 +,
Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 24/03/2021 16:16, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:51:14 +,
Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 24/03/2021 13:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:39:13 +,
Suzuki K P
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:25:12 +,
Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>
> On 24/03/2021 16:16, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:51:14 +,
> > Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >>
> >> On 24/03/2021 13:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:39:13 +,
> >>> Suzuki K Poulose wrote
On 24/03/2021 16:16, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:51:14 +,
Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 24/03/2021 13:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:39:13 +,
Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 23/03/2021 18:21, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Suzuki?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:06:3
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:51:14 +,
Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>
> On 24/03/2021 13:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:39:13 +,
> > Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23/03/2021 18:21, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >>> Hi Suzuki?
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:06:33PM +00
On 24/03/2021 13:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:39:13 +,
Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 23/03/2021 18:21, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Suzuki?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:06:33PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
tsb csync synchronizes the trace operation of instructions.
The instr
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:39:13 +,
Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>
> On 23/03/2021 18:21, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > Hi Suzuki?
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:06:33PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >> tsb csync synchronizes the trace operation of instructions.
> >> The instruction is a nop when
On 23/03/2021 18:21, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Suzuki?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:06:33PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
tsb csync synchronizes the trace operation of instructions.
The instruction is a nop when FEAT_TRF is not implemented.
Cc: Mathieu Poirier
Cc: Mike Leach
Cc: Catalin Marin
Hi Suzuki?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:06:33PM +, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> tsb csync synchronizes the trace operation of instructions.
> The instruction is a nop when FEAT_TRF is not implemented.
>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier
> Cc: Mike Leach
> Cc: Catalin Marinas
> Cc: Will Deacon
> Signed-off
tsb csync synchronizes the trace operation of instructions.
The instruction is a nop when FEAT_TRF is not implemented.
Cc: Mathieu Poirier
Cc: Mike Leach
Cc: Catalin Marinas
Cc: Will Deacon
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertio
12 matches
Mail list logo