The jz4780_bch_init name was confusing, as it suggested that its content
should be executed once at init time, whereas what the function really
does is reset the hardware for a new ECC operation.

Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net>
---

Notes:
    v5: New patch

 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c 
b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c
index fdf483a49f7b..7635753bd7ea 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c
@@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ struct jz4780_bch {
        struct mutex lock;
 };
 
-static void jz4780_bch_init(struct jz4780_bch *bch,
-                           struct jz4780_bch_params *params, bool encode)
+static void jz4780_bch_reset(struct jz4780_bch *bch,
+                            struct jz4780_bch_params *params, bool encode)
 {
        u32 reg;
 
@@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ int jz4780_bch_calculate(struct jz4780_bch *bch, struct 
jz4780_bch_params *param
        int ret = 0;
 
        mutex_lock(&bch->lock);
-       jz4780_bch_init(bch, params, true);
+
+       jz4780_bch_reset(bch, params, true);
        jz4780_bch_write_data(bch, buf, params->size);
 
        if (jz4780_bch_wait_complete(bch, BCH_BHINT_ENCF, NULL)) {
@@ -220,7 +221,7 @@ int jz4780_bch_correct(struct jz4780_bch *bch, struct 
jz4780_bch_params *params,
 
        mutex_lock(&bch->lock);
 
-       jz4780_bch_init(bch, params, false);
+       jz4780_bch_reset(bch, params, false);
        jz4780_bch_write_data(bch, buf, params->size);
        jz4780_bch_write_data(bch, ecc_code, params->bytes);
 
-- 
2.11.0

Reply via email to