.de>; Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>; H.
> > Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>; Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>; Jork
> > Loeser <jork.loe...@microsoft.com>; Simon Xiao <six...@microsoft.com>;
> > Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> > Subj
verproject.org; linux-
> > ker...@vger.kernel.org; KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang
> > ; Stephen Hemminger ;
> > Thomas Gleixner ; Ingo Molnar ; H.
> > Peter Anvin ; Steven Rostedt ; Jork
> > Loeser ; Simon Xiao ;
> > Andy Lutomirski
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] x86/
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Jork Loeser wrote:
>> > +#define HV_FLUSH_ALL_PROCESSORS0x0001
>> > +#define HV_FLUSH_ALL_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_SPACES0x0002
>> > +#define HV_FLUSH_NON_GLOBAL_MAPPINGS_ONLY 0x0004
>> > +#define
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Jork Loeser wrote:
>> > +#define HV_FLUSH_ALL_PROCESSORS0x0001
>> > +#define HV_FLUSH_ALL_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_SPACES0x0002
>> > +#define HV_FLUSH_NON_GLOBAL_MAPPINGS_ONLY 0x0004
>> > +#define
Jork
> Loeser <jork.loe...@microsoft.com>; Simon Xiao <six...@microsoft.com>;
> Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] x86/hyper-v: use hypercall for remote TLB flush
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vk
Hemminger ;
> Thomas Gleixner ; Ingo Molnar ; H.
> Peter Anvin ; Steven Rostedt ; Jork
> Loeser ; Simon Xiao ;
> Andy Lutomirski
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] x86/hyper-v: use hypercall for remote TLB flush
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov
>
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hyper-V host can suggest us to use hypercall for doing remote TLB flush,
> this is supposed to work faster than IPIs.
>
> Implementation details: to do HvFlushVirtualAddress{Space,List} hypercalls
> we need to put the
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hyper-V host can suggest us to use hypercall for doing remote TLB flush,
> this is supposed to work faster than IPIs.
>
> Implementation details: to do HvFlushVirtualAddress{Space,List} hypercalls
> we need to put the input somewhere in
Hyper-V host can suggest us to use hypercall for doing remote TLB flush,
this is supposed to work faster than IPIs.
Implementation details: to do HvFlushVirtualAddress{Space,List} hypercalls
we need to put the input somewhere in memory and we don't really want to
have memory allocation on each
Hyper-V host can suggest us to use hypercall for doing remote TLB flush,
this is supposed to work faster than IPIs.
Implementation details: to do HvFlushVirtualAddress{Space,List} hypercalls
we need to put the input somewhere in memory and we don't really want to
have memory allocation on each
10 matches
Mail list logo