On 06/05/24 16:07, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 6/5/24 15:24, Qais Yousef wrote:
> >>> But rt is a shortened version of realtime, and so it is making *it less*
> >>> clear that we also have DL here.
> >> Can SCHED_DL be considered a real-time scheduling class as in opposite
> >> to SCHED_
On 6/5/24 15:24, Qais Yousef wrote:
>>> But rt is a shortened version of realtime, and so it is making *it less*
>>> clear that we also have DL here.
>> Can SCHED_DL be considered a real-time scheduling class as in opposite
>> to SCHED_BATCH for instance? Due to its requirements it fits for a real
On 06/05/24 11:32, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-06-04 17:57:46 [+0200], Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> > On 6/4/24 16:42, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > > - (wakeup_rt && !dl_task(p) && !rt_task(p)) ||
> > > + (wakeup_rt && !realtime_task(p)) ||
> >
> > I do not like bikesheddin
On 6/5/24 11:32, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-06-04 17:57:46 [+0200], Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
>> On 6/4/24 16:42, Qais Yousef wrote:
>>> - (wakeup_rt && !dl_task(p) && !rt_task(p)) ||
>>> + (wakeup_rt && !realtime_task(p)) ||
>>
>> I do not like bikeshedding, and
On 2024-06-04 17:57:46 [+0200], Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 6/4/24 16:42, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > - (wakeup_rt && !dl_task(p) && !rt_task(p)) ||
> > + (wakeup_rt && !realtime_task(p)) ||
>
> I do not like bikeshedding, and no hard feelings...
>
> But rt is a shortened versio
On 6/4/24 18:37, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:57:46 +0200
> Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
>
>> On 6/4/24 16:42, Qais Yousef wrote:
>>> - (wakeup_rt && !dl_task(p) && !rt_task(p)) ||
>>> + (wakeup_rt && !realtime_task(p)) ||
>>
>> I do not like bikeshedding, and
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:57:46 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 6/4/24 16:42, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > - (wakeup_rt && !dl_task(p) && !rt_task(p)) ||
> > + (wakeup_rt && !realtime_task(p)) ||
>
> I do not like bikeshedding, and no hard feelings...
>
> But rt is a shortened
On 6/4/24 16:42, Qais Yousef wrote:
> - (wakeup_rt && !dl_task(p) && !rt_task(p)) ||
> + (wakeup_rt && !realtime_task(p)) ||
I do not like bikeshedding, and no hard feelings...
But rt is a shortened version of realtime, and so it is making *it less*
clear that we also have DL here
rt_task() checks if a task has RT priority. But depends on your
dictionary, this could mean it belongs to RT class, or is a 'realtime'
task, which includes RT and DL classes.
Since this has caused some confusion already on discussion [1], it
seemed a clean up is due.
I define the usage of rt_task
9 matches
Mail list logo
