Hi Minchan
Thanks for reviewing.
On 2017/2/2 15:28, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:00:23AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Wed 01-02-17 18:46:36, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:59:24AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Minchan
Thanks for reviewing.
On 2017/2/2 15:28, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:00:23AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Wed 01-02-17 18:46:36, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:59:24AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
hi Minchan,
Thanks for your reviewing.
On 2017/2/1 17:46, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:59:24AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Yisheng,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM +0800, ys...@foxmail.com wrote:
From:
hi Minchan,
Thanks for your reviewing.
On 2017/2/1 17:46, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:59:24AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Yisheng,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM +0800, ys...@foxmail.com wrote:
From:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:00:23AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 01-02-17 18:46:36, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:59:24AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > Hi Yisheng,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:00:23AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 01-02-17 18:46:36, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:59:24AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > Hi Yisheng,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM
On Wed 01-02-17 18:46:36, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:59:24AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > Hi Yisheng,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM +0800, ys...@foxmail.com wrote:
> > > > From: Yisheng Xie
On Wed 01-02-17 18:46:36, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:59:24AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > Hi Yisheng,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM +0800, ys...@foxmail.com wrote:
> > > > From: Yisheng Xie
> > > >
> > >
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:59:24AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Yisheng,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM +0800, ys...@foxmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Yisheng Xie
> > >
> > > This patch changes the return type
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:59:24AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Yisheng,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM +0800, ys...@foxmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Yisheng Xie
> > >
> > > This patch changes the return type of
On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Yisheng,
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM +0800, ys...@foxmail.com wrote:
> > From: Yisheng Xie
> >
> > This patch changes the return type of isolate_movable_page()
> > from bool to int. It will return 0 when
On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Yisheng,
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM +0800, ys...@foxmail.com wrote:
> > From: Yisheng Xie
> >
> > This patch changes the return type of isolate_movable_page()
> > from bool to int. It will return 0 when isolate movable page
> >
Hi Yisheng,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM +0800, ys...@foxmail.com wrote:
> From: Yisheng Xie
>
> This patch changes the return type of isolate_movable_page()
> from bool to int. It will return 0 when isolate movable page
> successfully, return -EINVAL when the page
Hi Yisheng,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM +0800, ys...@foxmail.com wrote:
> From: Yisheng Xie
>
> This patch changes the return type of isolate_movable_page()
> from bool to int. It will return 0 when isolate movable page
> successfully, return -EINVAL when the page is not a non-lru
From: Yisheng Xie
This patch changes the return type of isolate_movable_page()
from bool to int. It will return 0 when isolate movable page
successfully, return -EINVAL when the page is not a non-lru movable
page, and for other cases it will return -EBUSY.
There is no
From: Yisheng Xie
This patch changes the return type of isolate_movable_page()
from bool to int. It will return 0 when isolate movable page
successfully, return -EINVAL when the page is not a non-lru movable
page, and for other cases it will return -EBUSY.
There is no functional change within
16 matches
Mail list logo