On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> (I just noticed that I missed this patch, sorry)
Thanks for the review!
> On 10/06/2017 08:30 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Send PVCALLS_RELEASE to the backend and wait for a reply. Take both
> > in_mutex and out_mutex to avoid concurrent accesse
(I just noticed that I missed this patch, sorry)
On 10/06/2017 08:30 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Send PVCALLS_RELEASE to the backend and wait for a reply. Take both
> in_mutex and out_mutex to avoid concurrent accesses. Then, free the
> socket.
>
> For passive sockets, check whether we have al
Send PVCALLS_RELEASE to the backend and wait for a reply. Take both
in_mutex and out_mutex to avoid concurrent accesses. Then, free the
socket.
For passive sockets, check whether we have already pre-allocated an
active socket for the purpose of being accepted. If so, free that as
well.
Signed-off
3 matches
Mail list logo