Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

On 2/12/21 12:46 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched > copy of the resource table. That way we can start from the same > resource table without having to worry about original values or what > elements the startup code has changed when

Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

Hi Mathieu, url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mathieu-Poirier/remoteproc-Add-support-for-detaching-a-remote-processor/20210212-075607 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next config: ia64-randconfig-m031-20210209 (attached as .config) compiler

Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table (fwd)

There are identical kfrees on lines 2078 and 2080. julia -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:45:50 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: kbu...@lists.01.org Cc: l...@intel.com, Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource

[PATCH v5 13/19] remoteproc: Properly deal with the resource table

If it is possible to detach the remote processor, keep an untouched copy of the resource table. That way we can start from the same resource table without having to worry about original values or what elements the startup code has changed when re-attaching to the remote processor. Reported-by: Ar