On 1/18/2015 4:13 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 01/18/15 12:56, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 01/18/15 12:17, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Wolfram,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100,
On 1/18/2015 4:13 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 01/18/15 12:56, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 01/18/15 12:17, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Wolfram,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On
On 01/18/15 12:56, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 01/18/15 12:17, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Wolfram,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 01/18/15 12:17, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >Hello Wolfram,
> >
> >On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >>On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >>>On Sun, Jan 18,
On 01/18/15 12:17, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Wolfram,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 01/17/15 00:42, Ray Jui wrote:
+
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:17:59PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Wolfram,
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > >
Hello Wolfram,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > > On 01/17/15 00:42, Ray Jui wrote:
> > > >+complete_all(_i2c->done);
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > On 01/17/15 00:42, Ray Jui wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >+/*
> > >+ * Can be expanded in the future if more interrupt status bits are
> >
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 01/17/15 00:42, Ray Jui wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >+/*
> >+ * Can be expanded in the future if more interrupt status bits are utilized
> >+ */
> >+#define ISR_MASK (1<< IS_M_START_BUSY_SHIFT)
> >+
> >+static irqreturn_t
On 01/17/15 00:42, Ray Jui wrote:
[...]
+/*
+ * Can be expanded in the future if more interrupt status bits are utilized
+ */
+#define ISR_MASK (1<< IS_M_START_BUSY_SHIFT)
+
+static irqreturn_t bcm_iproc_i2c_isr(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ struct bcm_iproc_i2c_dev *iproc_i2c = data;
+
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 01/17/15 00:42, Ray Jui wrote:
[...]
+/*
+ * Can be expanded in the future if more interrupt status bits are utilized
+ */
+#define ISR_MASK (1 IS_M_START_BUSY_SHIFT)
+
+static irqreturn_t
Hello Wolfram,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 01/17/15 00:42, Ray Jui wrote:
+complete_all(iproc_i2c-done);
On 01/18/15 12:17, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Wolfram,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 01/17/15 00:42, Ray Jui wrote:
+
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 01/17/15 00:42, Ray Jui wrote:
[...]
+/*
+ * Can be expanded in the future if more interrupt status bits are
utilized
+ */
+#define
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:17:59PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Wolfram,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:14:04AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On
On 01/18/15 12:56, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 01/18/15 12:17, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Wolfram,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe
On 01/17/15 00:42, Ray Jui wrote:
[...]
+/*
+ * Can be expanded in the future if more interrupt status bits are utilized
+ */
+#define ISR_MASK (1 IS_M_START_BUSY_SHIFT)
+
+static irqreturn_t bcm_iproc_i2c_isr(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ struct bcm_iproc_i2c_dev *iproc_i2c = data;
+
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 01/18/15 12:17, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Wolfram,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:47:41AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at
Add initial support to the Broadcom iProc I2C controller found in the
iProc family of SoCs.
The iProc I2C controller has separate internal TX and RX FIFOs, each has
a size of 64 bytes. The iProc I2C controller supports two bus speeds
including standard mode (100kHz) and fast mode (400kHz)
Add initial support to the Broadcom iProc I2C controller found in the
iProc family of SoCs.
The iProc I2C controller has separate internal TX and RX FIFOs, each has
a size of 64 bytes. The iProc I2C controller supports two bus speeds
including standard mode (100kHz) and fast mode (400kHz)
20 matches
Mail list logo