On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 10:38 AM Zev Weiss wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 02:24:08AM CDT, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >On Thursday, April 8, 2021, Zev Weiss wrote:
> >
> >> This splits dedicated aspeed_vuart_set_{sirq,lpc_address}() functions
> >> out of the sysfs store functions in preparation f
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 02:24:08AM CDT, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thursday, April 8, 2021, Zev Weiss wrote:
This splits dedicated aspeed_vuart_set_{sirq,lpc_address}() functions
out of the sysfs store functions in preparation for adding DT
properties that will be poking the same registers. Wh
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 12:06:16AM CDT, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021, at 10:46, Zev Weiss wrote:
This splits dedicated aspeed_vuart_set_{sirq,lpc_address}() functions
out of the sysfs store functions in preparation for adding DT
properties that will be poking the same registers. W
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021, at 10:46, Zev Weiss wrote:
> This splits dedicated aspeed_vuart_set_{sirq,lpc_address}() functions
> out of the sysfs store functions in preparation for adding DT
> properties that will be poking the same registers. While we're at it,
> these functions now provide some basic
This splits dedicated aspeed_vuart_set_{sirq,lpc_address}() functions
out of the sysfs store functions in preparation for adding DT
properties that will be poking the same registers. While we're at it,
these functions now provide some basic bounds-checking on their
arguments.
Signed-off-by: Zev W
5 matches
Mail list logo
