On 13/06/16 22:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, June 10, 2016 06:38:01 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Hi,
On 11/05/16 16:37, Sudeep Holla wrote:
ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local
On 13/06/16 22:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, June 10, 2016 06:38:01 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Hi,
On 11/05/16 16:37, Sudeep Holla wrote:
ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local
On Friday, June 10, 2016 06:38:01 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
Hi,
> On 11/05/16 16:37, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
> > method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power
> > states for each node in a
On Friday, June 10, 2016 06:38:01 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
Hi,
> On 11/05/16 16:37, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
> > method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power
> > states for each node in a
Hi Rafael,
On 11/05/16 16:37, Sudeep Holla wrote:
ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power
states for each node in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can
use _LPI object to select a local
Hi Rafael,
On 11/05/16 16:37, Sudeep Holla wrote:
ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power
states for each node in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can
use _LPI object to select a local
On 18/05/16 20:13, Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
On 5/18/2016 11:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 17/05/16 18:46, Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
Hi Sudeep,
On 5/11/2016 9:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
+
+static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+{
+int ret, i;
+struct
On 18/05/16 20:13, Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
On 5/18/2016 11:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 17/05/16 18:46, Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
Hi Sudeep,
On 5/11/2016 9:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
+
+static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+{
+int ret, i;
+struct
On 5/18/2016 11:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 17/05/16 18:46, Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
>> Hi Sudeep,
>>
>> On 5/11/2016 9:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> +
>>> +static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>>> +{
>>> +int ret, i;
>>> +struct
On 5/18/2016 11:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 17/05/16 18:46, Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
>> Hi Sudeep,
>>
>> On 5/11/2016 9:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> +
>>> +static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>>> +{
>>> +int ret, i;
>>> +struct
On 17/05/16 18:46, Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
Hi Sudeep,
On 5/11/2016 9:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
+
+static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+{
+ int ret, i;
+ struct acpi_lpi_states_array *info;
+ struct acpi_device *d = NULL;
+ acpi_handle
On 17/05/16 18:46, Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
Hi Sudeep,
On 5/11/2016 9:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
+
+static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+{
+ int ret, i;
+ struct acpi_lpi_states_array *info;
+ struct acpi_device *d = NULL;
+ acpi_handle
Hi Sudeep,
On 5/11/2016 9:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> +
> +static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> +{
> + int ret, i;
> + struct acpi_lpi_states_array *info;
> + struct acpi_device *d = NULL;
> + acpi_handle handle = pr->handle, pr_ahandle;
> +
Hi Sudeep,
On 5/11/2016 9:37 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> +
> +static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> +{
> + int ret, i;
> + struct acpi_lpi_states_array *info;
> + struct acpi_device *d = NULL;
> + acpi_handle handle = pr->handle, pr_ahandle;
> +
ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power
states for each node in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can
use _LPI object to select a local power state for each level of processor
hierarchy in
ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate
method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power
states for each node in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can
use _LPI object to select a local power state for each level of processor
hierarchy in
16 matches
Mail list logo