Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:55:47PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > const ? Maybe provide a:
> >
> > #define DEFINE_PHY_OPS(name)\
> > const struct phy_ops #name_phy_ops = {
> >
> > macro ? This will force people to add the const keyword
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> const ? Maybe provide a:
>
> #define DEFINE_PHY_OPS(name)\
> const struct phy_ops #name_phy_ops = {
>
> macro ? This will force people to add the const keyword :-)
Forcing people to use const structures is good, but I think it would be
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:23:50PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Used the generic PHY framework API to create the PHY. omap_usb2_suspend
> is split into omap_usb_suspend and omap_usb_resume in order to align
> with the new framework.
>
> However using the old USB PHY library cannot be
Used the generic PHY framework API to create the PHY. omap_usb2_suspend
is split into omap_usb_suspend and omap_usb_resume in order to align
with the new framework.
However using the old USB PHY library cannot be completely removed
because OTG is intertwined with PHY and moving to the new
Used the generic PHY framework API to create the PHY. omap_usb2_suspend
is split into omap_usb_suspend and omap_usb_resume in order to align
with the new framework.
However using the old USB PHY library cannot be completely removed
because OTG is intertwined with PHY and moving to the new
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:23:50PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Used the generic PHY framework API to create the PHY. omap_usb2_suspend
is split into omap_usb_suspend and omap_usb_resume in order to align
with the new framework.
However using the old USB PHY library cannot be
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
const ? Maybe provide a:
#define DEFINE_PHY_OPS(name)\
const struct phy_ops #name_phy_ops = {
macro ? This will force people to add the const keyword :-)
Forcing people to use const structures is good, but I think it would be
better
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:55:47PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
const ? Maybe provide a:
#define DEFINE_PHY_OPS(name)\
const struct phy_ops #name_phy_ops = {
macro ? This will force people to add the const keyword :-)
8 matches
Mail list logo