On 08/11/18 14:11, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 11/07/2018 11:38 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 07/11/18 07:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:34:16PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >>> It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
>
On 08/11/18 14:11, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 11/07/2018 11:38 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 07/11/18 07:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:34:16PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >>> It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
>
On 11/07/2018 11:38 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/11/18 07:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:34:16PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>> It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
>>> below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
>>
On 11/07/2018 11:38 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/11/18 07:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:34:16PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>> It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
>>> below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
>>
On 07/11/18 17:38, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/11/18 07:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:34:16PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
> > > below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
> >
On 07/11/18 17:38, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/11/18 07:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:34:16PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
> > > below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
> >
Hi,
On 07/11/18 07:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:34:16PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
> > below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
>
> Yeah, looks good to me. Please feel free to add
>
Hi,
On 07/11/18 07:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:34:16PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
> > below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
>
> Yeah, looks good to me. Please feel free to add
>
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:34:16PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
> below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
Yeah, looks good to me. Please feel free to add
Acked-by: Tejun Heo
> Another bit that I'd be more
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:34:16PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
> below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
Yeah, looks good to me. Please feel free to add
Acked-by: Tejun Heo
> Another bit that I'd be more
Hi,
Ping.
Thanks,
- Juri
On 25/09/18 16:34, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi Li Zefan and Tejun Heo,
>
> It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
> below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
>
> Another bit that I'd be more comfortable after hearing your word on it
>
Hi,
Ping.
Thanks,
- Juri
On 25/09/18 16:34, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi Li Zefan and Tejun Heo,
>
> It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
> below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
>
> Another bit that I'd be more comfortable after hearing your word on it
>
Hi Li Zefan and Tejun Heo,
It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
Another bit that I'd be more comfortable after hearing your word on it
is this one (discussed over 5/5):
Hi Li Zefan and Tejun Heo,
It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
Another bit that I'd be more comfortable after hearing your word on it
is this one (discussed over 5/5):
callback_lock grants the holder read-only access to cpusets. For fixing
a synchronization issue between cpusets and scheduler core, it is now
required to make callback_lock available to core scheduler code.
Convert callback_lock to raw_spin_lock, so that it will be always safe
to acquire it from
callback_lock grants the holder read-only access to cpusets. For fixing
a synchronization issue between cpusets and scheduler core, it is now
required to make callback_lock available to core scheduler code.
Convert callback_lock to raw_spin_lock, so that it will be always safe
to acquire it from
16 matches
Mail list logo
