(2013/05/15 0:35), Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:57:35AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
The reasons why we don't allocate ELF note segment in the 1st kernel
(old memory) on page boundary is to keep backward compatibility for
old kernels, and that if doing so, we waste not a littl
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:57:35AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
[..]
> +/* Merges all the PT_NOTE headers into one. */
> +static int __init merge_note_headers_elf32(char *elfptr, size_t *elfsz,
> +char **notesegptr, size_t *notesegsz,
> +
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:57:35AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> The reasons why we don't allocate ELF note segment in the 1st kernel
> (old memory) on page boundary is to keep backward compatibility for
> old kernels, and that if doing so, we waste not a little memory due to
> round-up operatio
The reasons why we don't allocate ELF note segment in the 1st kernel
(old memory) on page boundary is to keep backward compatibility for
old kernels, and that if doing so, we waste not a little memory due to
round-up operation to fit the memory to page boundary since most of
the buffers are in per-
4 matches
Mail list logo