On 11/17/2012 08:38 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:11:15PM -0600, Daniel Santos wrote:
>> Ah yes. I did notice that at one point, but I think it slipped
>> my mind. Also, the kernel has introduced me to the usage of the
>> !! construct, of which I'm well versed in its affec
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:11:15PM -0600, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Ah yes. I did notice that at one point, but I think it slipped
> my mind. Also, the kernel has introduced me to the usage of the
> !! construct, of which I'm well versed in its affects in various
> situations and how gcc's optimizer e
On 11/15/2012 09:07 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:13:38PM -0600, danielfsan...@att.net wrote:
>> When calling BUILD_BUG_ON in an optimized build using gcc 4.3 and later,
>> the condition will be evaulated twice, possibily with side-effects.
>> This patch eliminates that er
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:13:38PM -0600, danielfsan...@att.net wrote:
> When calling BUILD_BUG_ON in an optimized build using gcc 4.3 and later,
> the condition will be evaulated twice, possibily with side-effects.
> This patch eliminates that error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos
> ---
> inc
When calling BUILD_BUG_ON in an optimized build using gcc 4.3 and later,
the condition will be evaulated twice, possibily with side-effects.
This patch eliminates that error.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos
---
include/linux/bug.h |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
5 matches
Mail list logo
