On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:24 AM Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 01:32:00PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 7/7/20 8:27 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > If the kmem_cache refcount is greater than one, we should not
> > > mark the root kmem_cache as dying. If we mark the root
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 01:32:00PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 7/7/20 8:27 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> > If the kmem_cache refcount is greater than one, we should not
> > mark the root kmem_cache as dying. If we mark the root kmem_cache
> > dying incorrectly, the non-root kmem_cache can never
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:43 PM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> On 7/15/20 5:13 PM, Muchun Song wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 7:32 PM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/7/20 8:27 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> >> > If the kmem_cache refcount is greater than one, we should not
> >> > mark the root
On 7/15/20 5:13 PM, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 7:32 PM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>
>> On 7/7/20 8:27 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
>> > If the kmem_cache refcount is greater than one, we should not
>> > mark the root kmem_cache as dying. If we mark the root kmem_cache
>> > dying
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:21 PM Shakeel Butt wrote:
>
> Sorry I missed this email.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:28 PM Muchun Song wrote:
> >
> > If the kmem_cache refcount is greater than one, we should not
> > mark the root kmem_cache as dying. If we mark the root kmem_cache
> > dying
Sorry I missed this email.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:28 PM Muchun Song wrote:
>
> If the kmem_cache refcount is greater than one, we should not
> mark the root kmem_cache as dying. If we mark the root kmem_cache
> dying incorrectly, the non-root kmem_cache can never be destroyed.
> It resulted
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 7:32 PM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> On 7/7/20 8:27 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> > If the kmem_cache refcount is greater than one, we should not
> > mark the root kmem_cache as dying. If we mark the root kmem_cache
> > dying incorrectly, the non-root kmem_cache can never be
On 7/7/20 8:27 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> If the kmem_cache refcount is greater than one, we should not
> mark the root kmem_cache as dying. If we mark the root kmem_cache
> dying incorrectly, the non-root kmem_cache can never be destroyed.
> It resulted in memory leak when memcg was destroyed. We
If the kmem_cache refcount is greater than one, we should not
mark the root kmem_cache as dying. If we mark the root kmem_cache
dying incorrectly, the non-root kmem_cache can never be destroyed.
It resulted in memory leak when memcg was destroyed. We can use the
following steps to reproduce.
1)
9 matches
Mail list logo