On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:27:54AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >
> > > So this also reminds me that as long as CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is selected,
> > > the blk_pm_add/put/peek_request functions will be in the block IO
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:27:54AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
So this also reminds me that as long as CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is selected,
the blk_pm_add/put/peek_request functions will be in the block IO path.
Shall
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:27:54AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
> > So this also reminds me that as long as CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is selected,
> > the blk_pm_add/put/peek_request functions will be in the block IO path.
> > Shall we introduce a new config option to
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:27:54AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
So this also reminds me that as long as CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is selected,
the blk_pm_add/put/peek_request functions will be in the block IO path.
Shall we introduce a new config option to
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> So this also reminds me that as long as CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is selected,
> the blk_pm_add/put/peek_request functions will be in the block IO path.
> Shall we introduce a new config option to selectively build block
> runtime PM functionality? something like
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
So this also reminds me that as long as CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is selected,
the blk_pm_add/put/peek_request functions will be in the block IO path.
Shall we introduce a new config option to selectively build block
runtime PM functionality? something like
On 01/08/2013 01:11 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
>> In August 2010, Jens and Alan discussed about "Runtime PM and the block
>> layer". http://marc.info/?t=12825910841=1=2
>> And then Alan has given a detailed implementation guide:
>>
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> In August 2010, Jens and Alan discussed about "Runtime PM and the block
> layer". http://marc.info/?t=12825910841=1=2
> And then Alan has given a detailed implementation guide:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=133727953625963=2
>
> To test:
> # ls -l
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
In August 2010, Jens and Alan discussed about Runtime PM and the block
layer. http://marc.info/?t=12825910841r=1w=2
And then Alan has given a detailed implementation guide:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsim=133727953625963w=2
To test:
# ls -l
On 01/08/2013 01:11 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
In August 2010, Jens and Alan discussed about Runtime PM and the block
layer. http://marc.info/?t=12825910841r=1w=2
And then Alan has given a detailed implementation guide:
In August 2010, Jens and Alan discussed about "Runtime PM and the block
layer". http://marc.info/?t=12825910841=1=2
And then Alan has given a detailed implementation guide:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi=133727953625963=2
To test:
# ls -l /sys/block/sda
In August 2010, Jens and Alan discussed about Runtime PM and the block
layer. http://marc.info/?t=12825910841r=1w=2
And then Alan has given a detailed implementation guide:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsim=133727953625963w=2
To test:
# ls -l /sys/block/sda
12 matches
Mail list logo