On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:01:03AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On 2015/05/14 0:41, William Cohen wrote:
> > On 05/13/2015 05:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >> On 2015/05/12 21:48, William Cohen wrote:
> >
> >>> Hi Dave,
> >>>
> >>> In some of the previous diagnostic output it looked like th
On 2015/05/14 0:41, William Cohen wrote:
> On 05/13/2015 05:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> On 2015/05/12 21:48, William Cohen wrote:
>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> In some of the previous diagnostic output it looked like things would go
>>> wrong
>>> in the entry.S when the D bit was cleared and the d
On 05/13/2015 03:58 PM, David Long wrote:
> On 05/13/15 11:41, William Cohen wrote:
>> On 05/13/2015 05:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> On 2015/05/12 21:48, William Cohen wrote:
>>
Hi Dave,
In some of the previous diagnostic output it looked like things would go
wrong
i
On 05/13/15 11:41, William Cohen wrote:
On 05/13/2015 05:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
On 2015/05/12 21:48, William Cohen wrote:
Hi Dave,
In some of the previous diagnostic output it looked like things would go wrong
in the entry.S when the D bit was cleared and the debug interrupts were
un
On 05/13/2015 05:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On 2015/05/12 21:48, William Cohen wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> In some of the previous diagnostic output it looked like things would go
>> wrong
>> in the entry.S when the D bit was cleared and the debug interrupts were
>> unmasksed. I wonder if so
On 2015/05/12 21:48, William Cohen wrote:
> On 05/12/2015 01:54 AM, David Long wrote:
>> On 05/05/15 11:48, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:14:51AM +0100, David Long wrote:
On 05/01/15 21:44, William Cohen wrote:
> Dave Long and I did some additional experimentation to be
On 05/12/2015 01:54 AM, David Long wrote:
> On 05/05/15 11:48, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:14:51AM +0100, David Long wrote:
>>> On 05/01/15 21:44, William Cohen wrote:
Dave Long and I did some additional experimentation to better
understand what is condition causes th
On 05/05/15 11:48, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:14:51AM +0100, David Long wrote:
On 05/01/15 21:44, William Cohen wrote:
Dave Long and I did some additional experimentation to better
understand what is condition causes the kernel to sometimes spew:
Unexpected kernel single-ste
On 05/05/2015 05:02 PM, William Cohen wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 11:48 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:14:51AM +0100, David Long wrote:
>>> On 05/01/15 21:44, William Cohen wrote:
Dave Long and I did some additional experimentation to better
understand what is condition c
On 05/05/2015 11:48 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:14:51AM +0100, David Long wrote:
>> On 05/01/15 21:44, William Cohen wrote:
>>> Dave Long and I did some additional experimentation to better
>>> understand what is condition causes the kernel to sometimes spew:
>>>
>>> Unexpec
On 05/05/2015 11:48 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:14:51AM +0100, David Long wrote:
>> On 05/01/15 21:44, William Cohen wrote:
>>> Dave Long and I did some additional experimentation to better
>>> understand what is condition causes the kernel to sometimes spew:
>>>
>>> Unexpec
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:14:51AM +0100, David Long wrote:
> On 05/01/15 21:44, William Cohen wrote:
> > Dave Long and I did some additional experimentation to better
> > understand what is condition causes the kernel to sometimes spew:
> >
> > Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1
> >
>
On 05/01/15 21:44, William Cohen wrote:
On 04/29/2015 06:23 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:58:21AM +0100, William Cohen wrote:
Hi All,
Hi Will,
I have been experimenting with the patches for arm64 kprobes support.
On occasion the kernel gets stuck in a loop printing outpu
On 04/29/2015 06:23 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:58:21AM +0100, William Cohen wrote:
>> Hi All,
>
> Hi Will,
>
>> I have been experimenting with the patches for arm64 kprobes support.
>> On occasion the kernel gets stuck in a loop printing output:
>>
>> Unexpected kernel s
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:58:21AM +0100, William Cohen wrote:
> Hi All,
Hi Will,
> I have been experimenting with the patches for arm64 kprobes support.
> On occasion the kernel gets stuck in a loop printing output:
>
> Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1
>
> This message by itself
On 04/21/15 07:42, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2015/04/21 5:19), David Long wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long"
>>
>> This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches,
>> first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised
>> by
>> reviewers and also
Hi All,
I have been experimenting with the patches for arm64 kprobes support.
On occasion the kernel gets stuck in a loop printing output:
Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1
This message by itself is not that enlighten. I added the attached
patch to get some additional information
On 04/21/2015 07:42 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2015/04/21 5:19), David Long wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long"
>>
>> This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches,
>> first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised
>> by
>> reviewers and
On 04/21/2015 07:42 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2015/04/21 5:19), David Long wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long"
>>
>> This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches,
>> first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised
>> by
>> reviewers and
(2015/04/21 5:19), David Long wrote:
> From: "David A. Long"
>
> This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches,
> first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised
> by
> reviewers and also fixes problems discovered during testing.
>
> Thi
From: "David A. Long"
This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches,
first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised by
reviewers and also fixes problems discovered during testing.
This patchset adds support for kernel probes(kprobes), ju
21 matches
Mail list logo
