On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:29:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:30 PM, David Daney
>> wrote:
>> > On 05/11/2016 02:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:29:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:30 PM, David Daney
>> wrote:
>> > On 05/11/2016 02:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:08 PM, David Daney
>> >>
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:29:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:30 PM, David Daney
> wrote:
> > On 05/11/2016 02:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:08 PM, David Daney
> >> wrote:
>
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:29:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:30 PM, David Daney
> wrote:
> > On 05/11/2016 02:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:08 PM, David Daney
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:30 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 02:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:08 PM, David Daney
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:30 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 02:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:08 PM, David Daney
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon
wrote:
On 05/11/2016 02:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:08 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM
On 05/11/2016 02:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:08 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27,
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:08 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:08 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney
On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
Based on
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney wrote:
>> > From: David Daney
>> >
>> > Based on
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney wrote:
>> > From: David Daney
>> >
>> > Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>> >
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney wrote:
> > From: David Daney
> >
> > Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> > for-next/core branch at
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney wrote:
> > From: David Daney
> >
> > Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> > for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for
> AArch32 state")
>
> ACPI
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for
> AArch32 state")
>
> ACPI 5.1 already introduced NUMA support for ARM64,
From: David Daney
Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for
AArch32 state")
ACPI 5.1 already introduced NUMA support for ARM64, which can get the
NUMA domain information
From: David Daney
Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for
AArch32 state")
ACPI 5.1 already introduced NUMA support for ARM64, which can get the
NUMA domain information from SRAT and SLIT table,
20 matches
Mail list logo