On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:01:13PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> Wouldn't we rather just remove the checks?
I think that's a different topic to be discussed with the KVM
maintainers. For now I will add defines for the magic numbers.
Regards,
Joerg
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:04:46PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:22:24AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > I don't think so, if I look at the history of these checks their whole
> > purpose seems to be to alert the developer/maintainer when their size
> > changes and that
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:22:24AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> I don't think so, if I look at the history of these checks their whole
> purpose seems to be to alert the developer/maintainer when their size
> changes and that they might not fit on the stack anymore. But that is
> taken care of in p
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > static inline void __unused_size_checks(void)
> > {
> > - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct vmcb_save_area) != 0x298);
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct vmcb_save_area)
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> static inline void __unused_size_checks(void)
> {
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct vmcb_save_area) != 0x298);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct vmcb_save_area) != 1032);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct vmcb_control_area) != 256
From: Tom Lendacky
Extend the vmcb_safe_area with SEV-ES fields and add a new
'struct ghcb' which will be used for guest-hypervisor communication.
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
---
arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 45 +-
arch/x86/kvm/s
6 matches
Mail list logo
