On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 05:37:13AM -0500, David Long wrote:
> On 02/28/14 05:12, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:38:58AM -0500, David Long wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
>>> index 7cd1763..179deac 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/k
On 02/28/14 05:12, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:38:58AM -0500, David Long wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
index 7cd1763..179deac 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
@@ -12,11 +12,9 @@
*/
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 10:12 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:38:58AM -0500, David Long wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
> > index 7cd1763..179deac 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/probes
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:38:58AM -0500, David Long wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
> index 7cd1763..179deac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/probes.c
> @@ -12,11 +12,9 @@
> */
>
> #include
> -#include
> #include
Ho
From: "David A. Long"
Change the generic ARM probes code to pass in the opcode and
architecture-specific
structure separately instead of using struct kprobe, so we do not pollute
code being used only for uprobes or other non-kprobes instruction
interpretation.
Signed-off-by: David A. Long
Acke
5 matches
Mail list logo