On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:16:53AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:19 AM Mark Brown wrote:
> > Yes. I've also applied it already and it's *still* being sent without
> > either a cover letter or the rest of the series :(
> There is a cover letter but it is being sent to Linux
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:19 AM Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:15:35PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 11:06 AM Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
> > > Fixes: 5d32a66541c46 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
> > > CONFIG_PCI set")
> > > Signed-off-by: Sinan
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:15 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 11:06 AM Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >
> > After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
> > CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
> > satisfied implicitly through depend
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:15:35PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 11:06 AM Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > Fixes: 5d32a66541c46 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without CONFIG_PCI
> > set")
> > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
> Sinan, I thought you received an ACK from Pierre-Louis
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 11:06 AM Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
> After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
> CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
> satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
> specified directly. This code reli
After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
specified directly. This code relies on IOSF_MBI and IOSF_MBI depends
on PCI. For this reason,
6 matches
Mail list logo
