Hello Rahul,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:49:14AM +0800, Tanwar, Rahul wrote:
> Our PWM controller is actually a PWM fan controller dedicated for
> controlling fan. I am looking for some suggestions from you on how
> to handle fan related optional properties in such a scenario.
>
> Should i create
Hi Rob,
On 1/8/2020 2:19 am, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:52:12PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
>> Intel's LGM(Lightning Mountain) SoC contains a PWM fan controller
>> which is only used to control the fan attached to the system. This
>> PWM controller does not have any other
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:52:12PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
> Intel's LGM(Lightning Mountain) SoC contains a PWM fan controller
> which is only used to control the fan attached to the system. This
> PWM controller does not have any other consumer other than fan.
> Add DT bindings documentation
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:52:12 +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
> Intel's LGM(Lightning Mountain) SoC contains a PWM fan controller
> which is only used to control the fan attached to the system. This
> PWM controller does not have any other consumer other than fan.
> Add DT bindings documentation for
Intel's LGM(Lightning Mountain) SoC contains a PWM fan controller
which is only used to control the fan attached to the system. This
PWM controller does not have any other consumer other than fan.
Add DT bindings documentation for this PWM fan controller.
Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar
---
5 matches
Mail list logo
