RE: [PATCH v6 1/2] dmaengine: Add Xilinx Central DMA DT Binding Documentation

m.com; ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk; > ga...@codeaurora.org; Michal Simek; Soren Brinkmann; Appana Durga > Kedareswara Rao; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dmaengine: Add Xilinx Central

RE: [PATCH v6 1/2] dmaengine: Add Xilinx Central DMA DT Binding Documentation

m.com; ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk; > ga...@codeaurora.org; Michal Simek; Soren Brinkmann; Appana Durga > Kedareswara Rao; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dmaengine: Add Xilinx Central

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dmaengine: Add Xilinx Central DMA DT Binding Documentation

On Monday 07 September 2015 18:03:08 Kedareswara rao Appana wrote: > +- dma-channel child node: Should have only one channel > What is the point of the child node if there is only one instance? Could you just fold this into the main node instead? (Sorry jumping in here without looking at the

[PATCH v6 1/2] dmaengine: Add Xilinx Central DMA DT Binding Documentation

Device-tree binding documentation of Xilinx Central DMA Engine. Signed-off-by: Kedareswara rao Appana --- Changes in v6: - None. Changes in v5: - None. Changes in v4: - None. Changes in v3: - Used proper alignment for all the properties. Changes in v2: - Change property 'xlnx,data-width' to

[PATCH v6 1/2] dmaengine: Add Xilinx Central DMA DT Binding Documentation

Device-tree binding documentation of Xilinx Central DMA Engine. Signed-off-by: Kedareswara rao Appana --- Changes in v6: - None. Changes in v5: - None. Changes in v4: - None. Changes in v3: - Used proper alignment for all the properties. Changes in v2: - Change property

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dmaengine: Add Xilinx Central DMA DT Binding Documentation

On Monday 07 September 2015 18:03:08 Kedareswara rao Appana wrote: > +- dma-channel child node: Should have only one channel > What is the point of the child node if there is only one instance? Could you just fold this into the main node instead? (Sorry jumping in here without looking at the