Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] ARM: pxa: pxa_cplds: add lubbock and mainstone IO

2015-04-30 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 30 April 2015 00:04:31 Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > Hi Arnd, > > I'm intending to queue that in pxa/fixes and then request pulling. > As you've been involved in the review from the beginning, can I have a > "Reviewed-by" ? The code is in an area that I'm not to

Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] ARM: pxa: pxa_cplds: add lubbock and mainstone IO

2015-04-29 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Robert Jarzmik writes: Hi Arnd, I'm intending to queue that in pxa/fixes and then request pulling. As you've been involved in the review from the beginning, can I have a "Reviewed-by" ? Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

[PATCH v6 1/3] ARM: pxa: pxa_cplds: add lubbock and mainstone IO

2015-04-27 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Historically, this support was in arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c and arch/arm/mach-pxa/mainstone.c. When gpio-pxa was moved to drivers/pxa, it became a driver, and its initialization and probing happened at postcore initcall. The lubbock code used to install the chained lubbock interrupt handler at in