On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:15:54PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner writes:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 23 2020 at 13:49, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 04:18:26PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> >>> Kees Cook writes:
> >>> Yes, we can, and I'm happy to
Thomas Gleixner writes:
> On Wed, Sep 23 2020 at 13:49, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 04:18:26PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>>> Kees Cook writes:
>>> Yes, we can, and I'm happy to follow up with that as part of my TIF
>>> clean up work, but can we not block the current
On Wed, Sep 23 2020 at 13:49, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 04:18:26PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>> Kees Cook writes:
>> Yes, we can, and I'm happy to follow up with that as part of my TIF
>> clean up work, but can we not block the current patchset to be merged
>> waiting
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:08:45PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> pet...@infradead.org writes:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> >> +static inline void __set_tsk_syscall_intercept(struct task_struct *tsk,
> >> +
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 04:18:26PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Kees Cook writes:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> >> Convert TIF_SECCOMP into a generic TI flag for any syscall interception
> >> work being done by the kernel. The actual
Kees Cook writes:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:59:49AM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>> Christian Brauner writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>> >> index afe01e232935..3511c98a7849 100644
>> >> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>> >> +++
Kees Cook writes:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>> Convert TIF_SECCOMP into a generic TI flag for any syscall interception
>> work being done by the kernel. The actual type of work is exposed by a
>> new flag field outside of thread_info. This
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Convert TIF_SECCOMP into a generic TI flag for any syscall interception
> work being done by the kernel. The actual type of work is exposed by a
> new flag field outside of thread_info. This ensures that the
>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:59:49AM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Christian Brauner writes:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> >> index afe01e232935..3511c98a7849 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> >>
pet...@infradead.org writes:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>> +static inline void __set_tsk_syscall_intercept(struct task_struct *tsk,
>> + unsigned int type)
>> +{
>> +tsk->syscall_intercept |= type;
>> +
>> +
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> +static inline void __set_tsk_syscall_intercept(struct task_struct *tsk,
> +unsigned int type)
> +{
> + tsk->syscall_intercept |= type;
> +
> + if (tsk->syscall_intercept)
> +
Christian Brauner writes:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>> index afe01e232935..3511c98a7849 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
>> @@ -959,7 +959,11 @@ struct task_struct {
>> kuid_t
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Convert TIF_SECCOMP into a generic TI flag for any syscall interception
> work being done by the kernel. The actual type of work is exposed by a
> new flag field outside of thread_info. This ensures that the
>
Convert TIF_SECCOMP into a generic TI flag for any syscall interception
work being done by the kernel. The actual type of work is exposed by a
new flag field outside of thread_info. This ensures that the
syscall_intercept field is only accessed if struct seccomp has to be
accessed already, such
14 matches
Mail list logo
