On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:48:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 10:34:21 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 2 April 2013 06:26, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:41:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >> On Monday, April 01, 2013 03:11:09 PM Nath
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 10:34:21 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 2 April 2013 06:26, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:41:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Monday, April 01, 2013 03:11:09 PM Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> >> > This eliminates the rest of the contention found in
On 2 April 2013 06:26, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:41:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, April 01, 2013 03:11:09 PM Nathan Zimmer wrote:
>> > This eliminates the rest of the contention found in __cpufreq_cpu_get.
>> > I am not seeing a way to use the rcu so we
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:41:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, April 01, 2013 03:11:09 PM Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> > This eliminates the rest of the contention found in __cpufreq_cpu_get.
> > I am not seeing a way to use the rcu so we will have to make due with a
> > rwlock for now.
On Monday, April 01, 2013 03:11:09 PM Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> This eliminates the rest of the contention found in __cpufreq_cpu_get.
> I am not seeing a way to use the rcu so we will have to make due with a
> rwlock for now.
>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Z
This eliminates the rest of the contention found in __cpufreq_cpu_get.
I am not seeing a way to use the rcu so we will have to make due with a
rwlock for now.
Cc: Viresh Kumar
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 38 +++---
6 matches
Mail list logo