On 11/30/2016 10:29 PM, Nayna wrote:
On 11/26/2016 09:17 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:45:39AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does
not support the securityfs pseudo files for displaying the
firmware event log.
This
On 12/01/2016 05:13 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:29:00PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
On 11/26/2016 09:17 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:45:39AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does
not support the se
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:29:00PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
>
>
> On 11/26/2016 09:17 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:45:39AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > > Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does
> > > not support the securityfs pseudo files for displa
On 11/26/2016 09:17 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:45:39AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does
not support the securityfs pseudo files for displaying the
firmware event log.
This patch enables support for providing the
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:45:39AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does
> not support the securityfs pseudo files for displaying the
> firmware event log.
>
> This patch enables support for providing the TPM 2.0 event log in
> binary form. TPM 2
Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does
not support the securityfs pseudo files for displaying the
firmware event log.
This patch enables support for providing the TPM 2.0 event log in
binary form. TPM 2.0 event log supports a crypto agile format that
records multiple digest
6 matches
Mail list logo
