Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] PM / devfreq: Cache OPP table reference in devfreq

2021-02-04 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 04-02-21, 17:46, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan > > Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi > > Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham > > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang > > Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi I am not sure if keeping both Acked-by and Reviewed-by make sense. I am keeping Acked-by as it was

Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] PM / devfreq: Cache OPP table reference in devfreq

2021-02-04 Thread Chanwoo Choi
Hi Hsin-Yi, On 2/4/21 5:14 PM, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote: > From: Saravana Kannan > > The OPP table can be used often in devfreq. Trying to get it each time can > be expensive, so cache it in the devfreq struct. > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan > Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi > Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham

[PATCH v6 2/3] PM / devfreq: Cache OPP table reference in devfreq

2021-02-04 Thread Hsin-Yi Wang
From: Saravana Kannan The OPP table can be used often in devfreq. Trying to get it each time can be expensive, so cache it in the devfreq struct. Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang --- drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 6