Hi Steve,
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 16:00 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:01:05 -0600
> Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> > @@ -1208,13 +1173,14 @@ static int __create_synth_event(int argc,
> > const char *name, const char **argv)
> > * where 'field' = type field_name
> > *
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 22:16 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:01:05 -0600
> Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> > Now that command parsing has been delegated to the create functions
> > and we're no longer constrained by argv_split(), we can modify the
> > synthetic event command parser
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:01:05 -0600
Tom Zanussi wrote:
> @@ -1208,13 +1173,14 @@ static int __create_synth_event(int argc, const char
> *name, const char **argv)
>* where 'field' = type field_name
>*/
>
> - if (name[0] == '\0' || argc < 1) {
> + mutex_lock(&event_mu
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:01:05 -0600
Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Now that command parsing has been delegated to the create functions
> and we're no longer constrained by argv_split(), we can modify the
> synthetic event command parser to better match the higher-level
> structure of the synthetic event com
Now that command parsing has been delegated to the create functions
and we're no longer constrained by argv_split(), we can modify the
synthetic event command parser to better match the higher-level
structure of the synthetic event commands, which is basically an event
name followed by a set of sem
5 matches
Mail list logo