Nicolai,
Regarding the debugfs_create_file() which ignores .mmap field in the
struct file_operations. The patch is a part of the kernel 4.8 in the
Ubuntu 16.10 and breaks quite a few online code examples of mmap
drivers.
Is is acceptable to replace the debugfs_create_file() by a macro and
fail
Nicolai,
Regarding the debugfs_create_file() which ignores .mmap field in the
struct file_operations. The patch is a part of the kernel 4.8 in the
Ubuntu 16.10 and breaks quite a few online code examples of mmap
drivers.
Is is acceptable to replace the debugfs_create_file() by a macro and
fail
Nicolai Stange writes:
> Sasha Levin writes:
>
>> On 05/18/2016 12:05 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:18:16AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Thanks a million for
Nicolai Stange writes:
> Sasha Levin writes:
>
>> On 05/18/2016 12:05 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:18:16AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Thanks a million for reporting!
>
> 1.) Do you have lockdep
Sasha Levin writes:
> On 05/18/2016 12:05 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:18:16AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
Thanks a million for reporting!
1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
>>>
Sasha Levin writes:
> On 05/18/2016 12:05 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:18:16AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
Thanks a million for reporting!
1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
>>>
>>> Yup, nothing there.
On 05/18/2016 12:05 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:18:16AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>>> Thanks a million for reporting!
>>>
>>> 1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
>>
>> Yup, nothing there.
>>
>>> 2.) Does this happen
On 05/18/2016 12:05 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:18:16AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>>> Thanks a million for reporting!
>>>
>>> 1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
>>
>> Yup, nothing there.
>>
>>> 2.) Does this happen
On 05/18/2016 12:32 PM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Sasha Levin writes:
>
>> On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>>> Thanks a million for reporting!
>>>
>>> 1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
>>
>> Yup, nothing there.
>>
>>> 2.) Does this happen before or after
On 05/18/2016 12:32 PM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Sasha Levin writes:
>
>> On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>>> Thanks a million for reporting!
>>>
>>> 1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
>>
>> Yup, nothing there.
>>
>>> 2.) Does this happen before or after userspace init has been
Sasha Levin writes:
> On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> Thanks a million for reporting!
>>
>> 1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
>
> Yup, nothing there.
>
>> 2.) Does this happen before or after userspace init has been spawned,
>> i.e. does the lockup
Sasha Levin writes:
> On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> Thanks a million for reporting!
>>
>> 1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
>
> Yup, nothing there.
>
>> 2.) Does this happen before or after userspace init has been spawned,
>> i.e. does the lockup happen at debugfs file
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:18:16AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> > Thanks a million for reporting!
> >
> > 1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
>
> Yup, nothing there.
>
> > 2.) Does this happen before or after userspace init has been spawned,
> >
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:18:16AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> > Thanks a million for reporting!
> >
> > 1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
>
> Yup, nothing there.
>
> > 2.) Does this happen before or after userspace init has been spawned,
> >
On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Thanks a million for reporting!
>
> 1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
Yup, nothing there.
> 2.) Does this happen before or after userspace init has been spawned,
> i.e. does the lockup happen at debugfs file creation time or
> possibly at
On 05/18/2016 11:01 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Thanks a million for reporting!
>
> 1.) Do you have lockdep enabled?
Yup, nothing there.
> 2.) Does this happen before or after userspace init has been spawned,
> i.e. does the lockup happen at debugfs file creation time or
> possibly at
Hi Sasha,
Sasha Levin writes:
> On 03/22/2016 09:11 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> Upon return of debugfs_remove()/debugfs_remove_recursive(), it might
>> still be attempted to access associated private file data through
>> previously opened struct file objects. If that
Hi Sasha,
Sasha Levin writes:
> On 03/22/2016 09:11 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> Upon return of debugfs_remove()/debugfs_remove_recursive(), it might
>> still be attempted to access associated private file data through
>> previously opened struct file objects. If that data has been freed by
>>
On 03/22/2016 09:11 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Upon return of debugfs_remove()/debugfs_remove_recursive(), it might
> still be attempted to access associated private file data through
> previously opened struct file objects. If that data has been freed by
> the caller of debugfs_remove*() in the
On 03/22/2016 09:11 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Upon return of debugfs_remove()/debugfs_remove_recursive(), it might
> still be attempted to access associated private file data through
> previously opened struct file objects. If that data has been freed by
> the caller of debugfs_remove*() in the
Upon return of debugfs_remove()/debugfs_remove_recursive(), it might
still be attempted to access associated private file data through
previously opened struct file objects. If that data has been freed by
the caller of debugfs_remove*() in the meanwhile, the reading/writing
process would either
Upon return of debugfs_remove()/debugfs_remove_recursive(), it might
still be attempted to access associated private file data through
previously opened struct file objects. If that data has been freed by
the caller of debugfs_remove*() in the meanwhile, the reading/writing
process would either
22 matches
Mail list logo