On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:39 +0400
Glauber Costa wrote:
> This patch implements destruction of memcg caches. Right now,
> only caches where our reference counter is the last remaining are
> deleted. If there are any other reference counters around, we just
> leave the caches lying around until th
On Fri 02-11-12 11:46:42, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 04:05 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:39 +0400
> > Glauber Costa wrote:
> >
> >> This patch implements destruction of memcg caches. Right now,
> >> only caches where our reference counter is the last remaining a
On 11/02/2012 04:05 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:39 +0400
> Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> This patch implements destruction of memcg caches. Right now,
>> only caches where our reference counter is the last remaining are
>> deleted. If there are any other reference counters ar
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:39 +0400
Glauber Costa wrote:
> This patch implements destruction of memcg caches. Right now,
> only caches where our reference counter is the last remaining are
> deleted. If there are any other reference counters around, we just
> leave the caches lying around until th
This patch implements destruction of memcg caches. Right now,
only caches where our reference counter is the last remaining are
deleted. If there are any other reference counters around, we just
leave the caches lying around until they go away.
When that happen, a destruction function is called fr
5 matches
Mail list logo