Hi
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:33:27AM +, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Cristian,
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
No worries.
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 10:15:55PM +, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Having added the support for SCMI protocols as modules in order to let
> > vendors extend the SCMI
Hi Cristian,
Sorry for the delay.
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 10:15:55PM +, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Having added the support for SCMI protocols as modules in order to let
> vendors extend the SCMI core with their own additions it seems odd to
> then force SCMI drivers built on top to use a
Having added the support for SCMI protocols as modules in order to let
vendors extend the SCMI core with their own additions it seems odd to
then force SCMI drivers built on top to use a static device table to
declare their devices since this way any new SCMI drivers addition
would need the core
3 matches
Mail list logo